From 12a31f4c130c551f82232d9ef7dfb608bd52c53f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:00:48 +0200 Subject: Reorganise repository using standard package layout --- pkg/man/GUS.Rd | 81 ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 81 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 pkg/man/GUS.Rd (limited to 'pkg/man/GUS.Rd') diff --git a/pkg/man/GUS.Rd b/pkg/man/GUS.Rd deleted file mode 100644 index f1f5f28..0000000 --- a/pkg/man/GUS.Rd +++ /dev/null @@ -1,81 +0,0 @@ -% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand -% Please edit documentation in R/GUS.R -\name{GUS} -\alias{GUS} -\alias{GUS.chent} -\alias{GUS.numeric} -\alias{print.GUS_result} -\title{Groundwater ubiquity score based on Gustafson (1989)} -\usage{ -GUS(...) - -\method{GUS}{numeric}(DT50, Koc, ...) - -\method{GUS}{chent}(chent, degradation_value = "DT50ref", - lab_field = "laboratory", redox = "aerobic", sorption_value = "Kfoc", - degradation_aggregator = geomean, sorption_aggregator = geomean, ...) - -\method{print}{GUS_result}(x, ..., digits = 1) -} -\arguments{ -\item{...}{Included in the generic to allow for further arguments later. Therefore -this also had to be added to the specific methods.} - -\item{DT50}{Half-life of the chemical in soil. Should be a field -half-life according to Gustafson (1989). However, leaching to the sub-soil -can not completely be excluded in field dissipation experiments and Gustafson -did not refer to any normalisation procedure, but says the field study should -be conducted under use conditions.} - -\item{Koc}{The sorption constant normalised to organic carbon. Gustafson -does not mention the nonlinearity of the sorption constant commonly -found and usually described by Freundlich sorption, therefore it is -unclear at which reference concentration the Koc should be observed -(and if the reference concentration would be in soil or in porewater).} - -\item{chent}{If a chent is given with appropriate information present in its -chyaml field, this information is used, with defaults specified below.} - -\item{degradation_value}{Which of the available degradation values should -be used?} - -\item{lab_field}{Should laboratory or field half-lives be used? This -defaults to lab in this implementation, in order to avoid -double-accounting for mobility. If comparability with the original GUS -values given by Gustafson (1989) is desired, non-normalised first-order -field half-lives obtained under actual use conditions should be used.} - -\item{redox}{Aerobic or anaerobic degradation data} - -\item{sorption_value}{Which of the available sorption values should be used? -Defaults to Kfoc as this is what is generally available from the European -pesticide peer review process. These values generally use a reference -concentration of 1 mg/L in porewater, that means they would be expected to -be Koc values at a concentration of 1 mg/L in the water phase.} - -\item{degradation_aggregator}{Function for aggregating half-lives} - -\item{sorption_aggregator}{Function for aggregation Koc values} - -\item{x}{An object of class GUS_result to be printed} - -\item{digits}{The number of digits used in the print method} -} -\value{ -A list with the DT50 and Koc used as well as the resulting score - of class GUS_result -} -\description{ -The groundwater ubiquity score GUS is calculated according to -the following equation -\deqn{GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})}{GUS = log10 DT50soil * (4 - log10 Koc)} -} -\author{ -Johannes Ranke -} -\references{ -Gustafson, David I. (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple -method for assessing pesticide leachability. \emph{Environmental -toxicology and chemistry} \bold{8}(4) 339–57. -} - -- cgit v1.2.1