This is reimplementation of Step 1 of the FOCUS Step 1 and 2 calculator version 3.2, authored by Michael Klein. Note that results for multiple applications should be compared to the corresponding results for a single application. At current, this is not done automatically in this implementation.
PEC_sw_focus(parent, rate, n = 1, i = NA, met = NULL, f_drift = NA, f_rd = 0.1, scenario = FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios$names)
| parent | A list containing substance specific parameters, e.g.
conveniently generated by |
|---|---|
| rate | The application rate in g/ha. Overriden when applications are given explicitly |
| n | The number of applications |
| i | The application interval |
| met | A list containing metabolite specific parameters. e.g.
conveniently generated by |
| f_drift | The fraction of the application rate reaching the waterbody
via drift. If NA, this is derived from the scenario name and the number
of applications via the drift data defined by the
|
| f_rd | The fraction of the amount applied reaching the waterbody via runoff/drainage. At Step 1, it is assumed to be 10 parent or a metabolite |
| scenario | The name of the scenario. Must be one of the scenario
names given in |
The formulas for input to the waterbody via runoff/drainage of the parent and subsequent formation of the metabolite in water is not documented in the model description coming with the calculator. As one would expecte, this additional input appears to be (as we get the same results) calculated by multiplying the application rate with the molar weight correction and the formation fraction in water/sediment systems.
Step 2 is not implemented.
FOCUS (2014) Generic guidance for Surface Water Scenarios (version 1.4). FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticde fate models and their USe. http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/projects_data/focus/sw/docs/Generic
Website of the Steps 1 and 2 calculator at the Joint Research Center of the European Union: http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/stepsonetwo
# Parent only dummy_1 <- chent_focus_sw(cwsat = 6000, DT50_ws = 6, Koc = 344.8) PEC_sw_focus(dummy_1, 3000, f_drift = 0)#> $f_drift #> [1] 0 #> #> $eq_rate_drift_s #> [1] 3000 #> #> $eq_rate_rd_s #> [1] 3000 #> #> $eq_rate_rd_parent_s #> [1] NA #> #> $input_drift_s #> [1] 0 #> #> $input_rd_s #> [1] 300 #> #> $f_rd_sw #> [1] 0.6850566 #> #> $f_rd_sed #> [1] 0.3149434 #> #> $PEC #> type #> Time PECsw TWAECsw PECsed TWAECsed #> 0 6.850566e+02 NA 2.362075e+03 NA #> 1 6.103161e+02 647.68635 2.104370e+03 2233.2225 #> 2 5.437298e+02 612.03420 1.874780e+03 2110.2939 #> 4 4.315586e+02 548.76030 1.488014e+03 1892.1255 #> 7 3.051580e+02 469.88375 1.052185e+03 1620.1592 #> 14 1.359325e+02 339.57370 4.686951e+02 1170.8501 #> 21 6.055102e+01 257.45458 2.087799e+02 887.7034 #> 28 2.697241e+01 203.47173 9.300089e+01 701.5705 #> 42 5.352005e+00 140.10377 1.845371e+01 483.0778 #> 50 2.123945e+00 118.24602 7.323361e+00 407.7123 #> 100 6.585062e-03 59.30629 2.270529e-02 204.4881 #> #> $PEC_sw_max #> [1] 685.0566 #> #> $PEC_sed_max #> [1] 2362.075 #># Metabolite new_dummy <- chent_focus_sw(mw = 250, Koc = 100) M1 <- chent_focus_sw(mw = 100, cwsat = 100, DT50_ws = 100, Koc = 50, max_ws = 0, max_soil = 0.5) PEC_sw_focus(new_dummy, 1000, scenario = "cereals, winter", met = M1)#> $f_drift #> [1] 0.02759 #> #> $eq_rate_drift_s #> [1] 0 #> #> $eq_rate_rd_s #> [1] 200 #> #> $eq_rate_rd_parent_s #> [1] 0 #> #> $input_drift_s #> [1] 0 #> #> $input_rd_s #> [1] 20 #> #> $f_rd_sw #> [1] 0.9375 #> #> $f_rd_sed #> [1] 0.0625 #> #> $PEC #> type #> Time PECsw TWAECsw PECsed TWAECsed #> 0 62.50000 NA 31.25000 NA #> 1 62.06828 62.28414 31.03414 31.14207 #> 2 61.63954 62.06890 30.81977 31.03445 #> 4 60.79093 61.64158 30.39547 30.82079 #> 7 59.53987 61.00800 29.76994 30.50400 #> 14 56.71995 59.56326 28.35997 29.78163 #> 21 54.03358 58.16414 27.01679 29.08207 #> 28 51.47444 56.80902 25.73722 28.40451 #> 42 46.71404 54.22460 23.35702 27.11230 #> 50 44.19417 52.81945 22.09709 26.40973 #> 100 31.25000 45.08422 15.62500 22.54211 #> #> $PEC_sw_max #> [1] 62.5 #> #> $PEC_sed_max #> [1] 31.25 #>