blob: 370dc5af83eb551139148922693257e1987bb953 (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
ℹ Testing mkin
✔ | F W S OK | Context
✔ | 5 | AIC calculation
✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.0s]
✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s]
✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [31.6s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [5.2s]
✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation
✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.5s]
✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s]
✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s]
✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [40.7s]
✖ | 1 1 10 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [13.2s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failure ('test_mixed.R:21'): Print methods work
Results have changed from known value recorded in 'print_dfop_saem_1.txt'.
old[13:23] vs new[13:23]
""
"Fitted parameters:"
" estimate lower upper"
- "parent_0 99.92 98.77 101.06"
+ "parent_0 99.96 98.82 101.11"
- "log_k1 -2.72 -2.95 -2.50"
+ "log_k1 -2.71 -2.94 -2.49"
- "log_k2 -4.14 -4.27 -4.01"
+ "log_k2 -4.14 -4.26 -4.01"
- "g_qlogis -0.35 -0.53 -0.16"
+ "g_qlogis -0.36 -0.54 -0.17"
- "a.1 0.92 0.68 1.16"
+ "a.1 0.93 0.69 1.17"
"b.1 0.05 0.04 0.06"
"SD.log_k1 0.37 0.23 0.51"
and 1 more ...
Skip ('test_mixed.R:78'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg
✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.6s]
✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.7s]
✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s]
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s]
✖ | 3 9 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [45.8s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failure ('test_multistart.R:44'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/mixed-model-fit-for-saem-object-with-mkin-transformations.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...)
at test_multistart.R:44:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
Failure ('test_multistart.R:55'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/llhist-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("llhist for dfop sfo fit", llhist_dfop_sfo)
at test_multistart.R:55:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
Failure ('test_multistart.R:56'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/parplot-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("parplot for dfop sfo fit", parplot_dfop_sfo)
at test_multistart.R:56:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.3s]
✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [9.0s]
✖ | 1 14 | Plotting [10.2s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failure ('test_plot.R:55'): Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'plot/mixed-model-fit-for-nlme-object.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('plot/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...)
at test_plot.R:55:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [71.7s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.5s]
✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series
✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.5s]
✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
✔ | 5 | Summary [0.2s]
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.2s]
✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [7.7s]
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.0s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Duration: 255.0 s
── Skipped tests ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)
• Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1)
• This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1)
[ FAIL 5 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 265 ]
|
