blob: fa808f22620b433cd38bda52111eca49f25604b4 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
|
ℹ Testing mkin
✔ | F W S OK | Context
✔ | 5 | AIC calculation
✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [1.6s]
✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 7 | Use of precompiled symbols in mkinpredict [3.3s]
✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [0.4s]
✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [13.4s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_dmta.R:88'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [2.5s]
✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation
✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.3s]
✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.5s]
✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s]
✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.1s]
✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.8s]
✔ | 1 11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [6.1s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_mixed.R:78'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg
✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.4s]
✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.5s]
✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.1s]
✔ | 12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [21.7s]
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.5s]
✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.8s]
✔ | 15 | Plotting [4.7s]
✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [32.0s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [0.5s]
✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series
✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [1.7s]
✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
✔ | 5 | Summary
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [3.0s]
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [0.7s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Duration: 120.2 s
── Skipped tests ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)
• Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1)
• This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1)
[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 277 ]
|
