aboutsummaryrefslogblamecommitdiff
path: root/README.md
blob: b7b4db6c8ec33e6e6e54a7fe97b02d6c0d6eee5a (plain) (tree)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9







                                                                      
                                                          
 
                      
                                                                                               

                                                                                                                               
                    
 




























































































































                                                                               

                                           
---
output: github_document
---

<!-- README.md is generated from README.rmd. Please edit that file -->



# chemCal - Calibration functions for analytical chemistry

<!-- badges: start -->
[![](https://www.r-pkg.org/badges/version/chemCal)](https://cran.r-project.org/package=chemCal)
[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.com/jranke/chemCal.svg?branch=master)](https://app.travis-ci.com/github/jranke/chemCal)
[![codecov](https://codecov.io/github/jranke/chemCal/branch/master/graphs/badge.svg)](https://codecov.io/github/jranke/chemCal)
<!-- badges: end -->

## Overview

chemCal is an R package providing some basic functions for conveniently working
with linear calibration curves with one explanatory variable.

## Installation

From within [R][r-project], get the official chemCal release using


```r
install.packages("chemCal")
```

## Usage

chemCal works with univariate linear models of class `lm`. Working with one of
the datasets coming with chemCal, we can produce a calibration plot using the
`calplot` function:

### Plotting a calibration


```r
library(chemCal)
m0 <- lm(y ~ x, data = massart97ex3)
calplot(m0)
```

![](man/figures/README-calplot-1.png)<!-- -->

### LOD and LOQ

If you use unweighted regression, as in the above example, we can calculate a
Limit Of Detection (LOD) from the calibration data.


```r
lod(m0)
#> $x
#> [1] 5.407085
#> 
#> $y
#> [1] 13.63911
```
This is the minimum detectable value (German: Erfassungsgrenze), i.e. the
value where the probability that the signal is not detected although the
analyte is present is below a specified error tolerance beta (default is 0.05
following the IUPAC recommendation).

You can also calculate the decision limit (German: Nachweisgrenze), i.e.
the value that is significantly different from the blank signal
with an error tolerance alpha (default is 0.05, again following
IUPAC recommendations) by setting beta to 0.5.


```r
lod(m0, beta = 0.5)
#> $x
#> [1] 2.720388
#> 
#> $y
#> [1] 8.314841
```

Furthermore, you can calculate the Limit Of Quantification (LOQ), being
defined as the value where the relative error of the quantification given the
calibration model reaches a prespecified value (default is 1/3).


```r
loq(m0)
#> $x
#> [1] 9.627349
#> 
#> $y
#> [1] 22.00246
```

### Confidence intervals for measured values

Finally, you can get a confidence interval for the values
measured using the calibration curve, i.e. for the inverse
predictions using the function `inverse.predict`.


```r
inverse.predict(m0, 90)
#> $Prediction
#> [1] 43.93983
#> 
#> $`Standard Error`
#> [1] 1.576985
#> 
#> $Confidence
#> [1] 3.230307
#> 
#> $`Confidence Limits`
#> [1] 40.70952 47.17014
```

If you have replicate measurements of the same sample,
you can also give a vector of numbers.


```r
inverse.predict(m0, c(91, 89, 87, 93, 90))
#> $Prediction
#> [1] 43.93983
#> 
#> $`Standard Error`
#> [1] 0.796884
#> 
#> $Confidence
#> [1] 1.632343
#> 
#> $`Confidence Limits`
#> [1] 42.30749 45.57217
```

## Reference

You can use the R help system to view documentation, or you can
have a look at the [online documentation][pd-site].

[r-project]: https://www.r-project.org/
[pd-site]: https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/chemCal/

Contact - Imprint