diff options
author | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
commit | 69504b635d388507bce650c44b3bfe17cad3383e (patch) | |
tree | 120114ff6dc2d1aeb4716efef90d71257ac47501 /INDEX | |
parent | 6d118690c0cae02fc5cd4b28c1a67eecde4d9f60 (diff) |
- Fixed the inverse prediction
- Now I have a working approach for the calculation of LOD and LOQ,
but it seems to be different from what everybody else is doing
(e.g. Massart chaper 13). I like it, however. Maybe it even
yields a paper.
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@8 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
Diffstat (limited to 'INDEX')
-rw-r--r-- | INDEX | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -3,5 +3,7 @@ calplot Plot calibration graphs from univariate linear chemCal-package Calibration functions for analytical chemistry din32645 Calibration data from DIN 32645 inverse.predict Predict x from y for a linear calibration +lod Estimate a limit of detection (LOD) or + quantification (LOQ) massart97ex3 Calibration data from Massart et al. (1997), example 3 |