diff options
author | Johannes Ranke <johannes.ranke@jrwb.de> | 2025-01-22 18:00:22 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-01-22 18:00:22 +0100 |
commit | 7790a01c57797eadf70454211b8255f9e3560393 (patch) | |
tree | ff5ee5503c23183f4a13ed6eb8b3843a1a662536 /man/linearity.Rd | |
parent | d36f7665da7ed855885bbbcd17b203d3e8804bab (diff) | |
parent | 34b6b8408f1ab8593ba1e9ed89a98830a4b92099 (diff) |
add linearity tests for calibration data
Diffstat (limited to 'man/linearity.Rd')
-rw-r--r-- | man/linearity.Rd | 64 |
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/man/linearity.Rd b/man/linearity.Rd new file mode 100644 index 0000000..52c2423 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/linearity.Rd @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand +% Please edit documentation in R/linearity.R +\name{linearity} +\alias{linearity} +\title{Assess the linearity of a calibration curve} +\usage{ +linearity(x, y, method = c("slope", "curvature"), tolerance = 0.1) +} +\arguments{ +\item{x}{numeric vector of independent values (usually concentrations).} + +\item{y}{numeric vector of dependent values (usually the signal of the +analytical device).} + +\item{method}{character string. Supported methods are "slope" and +"curvature".} + +\item{tolerance}{numeric value between 0 and 1, describing the acceptable +deviation from the median of the slopes or the signal-to-concentration +ratio. The default tolerance is 10\%.} +} +\value{ +returns a diagnostic plot +} +\description{ +A function to create diagnostic plots for the assessment of the linearity of +calibration data based on their point-to-point slope or the curvature. +The underlying methods follow ISO 84 66-1:2021 and DIN 32 402-51:2017 +(German Industrial Norm). +} +\details{ +The point-to-point slope method is based on the assumption that the slope +between two points should not vary greatly within the linear range. + +The curvature method is similar to the point-to-point slope method. Here, +the ratio between the instrument signal and the concentration of the +calibration standard is assumed not to vary greatly within the linear range. + +The use of the Mandel test is discouraged due to its limitations in the +identification of non-linear behaviour of calibration curves (Andrade and +Gomes-Carracedo, 2013). +} +\examples{ +# Continuous Flow Analysis (CFA) data +data(din38402b1) + +# Point-to-point slope plot +linearity(din38402b1$conc, din38402b1$ext, method = "slope") + +# Curvature plot +linearity(din38402b1$conc, din38402b1$ext, method = "curvature") + +} +\references{ +ISO 8466-1:2021. Water quality — Calibration and evaluation of +analytical methods — Part 1: Linear calibration function + +J. M. Andrade and M. P. Gomez-Carracedo (2013) Notes on the use of +Mandel's test to check for nonlinearity in laboratory calibrations. +Analytical Methods 5(5), 1145 - 1149. +} +\author{ +Anıl Axel Tellbüscher +} |