aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man/lod.Rd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'man/lod.Rd')
-rw-r--r--man/lod.Rd123
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 61 deletions
diff --git a/man/lod.Rd b/man/lod.Rd
index ce32670..05107f3 100644
--- a/man/lod.Rd
+++ b/man/lod.Rd
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand
+% Please edit documentation in R/lod.R
\name{lod}
\alias{lod}
\alias{lod.lm}
@@ -5,83 +7,82 @@
\alias{lod.default}
\title{Estimate a limit of detection (LOD)}
\usage{
- lod(object, \dots, alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.05, method = "default", tol = "default")
+lod(
+ object,
+ ...,
+ alpha = 0.05,
+ beta = 0.05,
+ method = "default",
+ tol = "default"
+)
}
\arguments{
- \item{object}{
- A univariate model object of class \code{\link{lm}} or
- \code{\link[MASS:rlm]{rlm}}
- with model formula \code{y ~ x} or \code{y ~ x - 1},
- optionally from a weighted regression.
- }
- \item{\dots}{
- Placeholder for further arguments that might be needed by
- future implementations.
- }
- \item{alpha}{
- The error tolerance for the decision limit (critical value).
- }
- \item{beta}{
- The error tolerance beta for the detection limit.
- }
- \item{method}{
- The \dQuote{default} method uses a prediction interval at the LOD
- for the estimation of the LOD, which obviously requires
- iteration. This is described for example in Massart, p. 432 ff.
- The \dQuote{din} method uses the prediction interval at
- x = 0 as an approximation.
- }
- \item{tol}{
- When the \dQuote{default} method is used, the default tolerance
- for the LOD on the x scale is the value of the smallest non-zero standard
- divided by 1000. Can be set to a numeric value to override this.
- }
+\item{object}{A univariate model object of class \code{\link{lm}} or
+\code{\link[MASS:rlm]{rlm}} with model formula \code{y ~ x} or \code{y ~ x -
+1}, optionally from a weighted regression.}
+
+\item{\dots}{Placeholder for further arguments that might be needed by
+future implementations.}
+
+\item{alpha}{The error tolerance for the decision limit (critical value).}
+
+\item{beta}{The error tolerance beta for the detection limit.}
+
+\item{method}{The \dQuote{default} method uses a prediction interval at the
+LOD for the estimation of the LOD, which obviously requires iteration. This
+is described for example in Massart, p. 432 ff. The \dQuote{din} method
+uses the prediction interval at x = 0 as an approximation.}
+
+\item{tol}{When the \dQuote{default} method is used, the default tolerance
+for the LOD on the x scale is the value of the smallest non-zero standard
+divided by 1000. Can be set to a numeric value to override this.}
}
\value{
- A list containig the corresponding x and y values of the estimated limit of
- detection of a model used for calibration.
+A list containig the corresponding x and y values of the estimated
+limit of detection of a model used for calibration.
}
\description{
- The decision limit (German: Nachweisgrenze) is defined as the signal or
- analyte concentration that is significantly different from the blank signal
- with a first order error alpha (one-sided significance test).
- The detection limit, or more precise, the minimum detectable value
- (German: Erfassungsgrenze), is then defined as the signal or analyte
- concentration where the probability that the signal is not detected although
- the analyte is present (type II or false negative error), is beta (also a
- one-sided significance test).
+The decision limit (German: Nachweisgrenze) is defined as the signal or
+analyte concentration that is significantly different from the blank signal
+with a first order error alpha (one-sided significance test). The detection
+limit, or more precise, the minimum detectable value (German:
+Erfassungsgrenze), is then defined as the signal or analyte concentration
+where the probability that the signal is not detected although the analyte
+is present (type II or false negative error), is beta (also a one-sided
+significance test).
}
\note{
- - The default values for alpha and beta are the ones recommended by IUPAC.
- - The estimation of the LOD in terms of the analyte amount/concentration
- xD from the LOD in the signal domain SD is done by simply inverting the
- calibration function (i.e. assuming a known calibration function).
- - The calculation of a LOD from weighted calibration models requires
- a weights argument for the internally used \code{\link{predict.lm}}
- function, which is currently not supported in R.
-}
-\references{
- Massart, L.M, Vandenginste, B.G.M., Buydens, L.M.C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P.J.,
- Smeyers-Verbeke, J. (1997) Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A,
- Chapter 13.7.8
-
- J. Inczedy, T. Lengyel, and A.M. Ure (2002) International Union of Pure and
- Applied Chemistry Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature: Definitive Rules.
- Web edition.
-
- Currie, L. A. (1997) Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including
- detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995).
- Analytica Chimica Acta 391, 105 - 126.
+* The default values for alpha and beta are the ones recommended by IUPAC.
+* The estimation of the LOD in terms of the analyte amount/concentration xD
+from the LOD in the signal domain SD is done by simply inverting the
+calibration function (i.e. assuming a known calibration function).
+* The calculation of a LOD from weighted calibration models requires a
+weights argument for the internally used \code{\link{predict.lm}}
+function, which is currently not supported in R.
}
\examples{
+
m <- lm(y ~ x, data = din32645)
lod(m)
# The critical value (decision limit, German Nachweisgrenze) can be obtained
# by using beta = 0.5:
lod(m, alpha = 0.01, beta = 0.5)
+
+}
+\references{
+Massart, L.M, Vandenginste, B.G.M., Buydens, L.M.C., De Jong,
+S., Lewi, P.J., Smeyers-Verbeke, J. (1997) Handbook of Chemometrics and
+Qualimetrics: Part A, Chapter 13.7.8
+
+J. Inczedy, T. Lengyel, and A.M. Ure (2002) International Union of Pure and
+Applied Chemistry Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature: Definitive Rules.
+Web edition.
+
+Currie, L. A. (1997) Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods
+including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations
+1995). Analytica Chimica Acta 391, 105 - 126.
}
\seealso{
- Examples for \code{\link{din32645}}
+Examples for \code{\link{din32645}}
}
-\keyword{manip}

Contact - Imprint