| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | 
 | 
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@22 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 | 
 | 
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@14 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 | 
 | 
- Now I have a working approach for the calculation of LOD and LOQ,
  but it seems to be different from what everybody else is doing
  (e.g. Massart chaper 13). I like it, however. Maybe it even 
  yields a paper.
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@8 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 | 
 | 
- In addition to the Massart examples, the sample data from dintest (DIN 32645)
  has been tested
- inverse.predict and calplot now also work on glm objects
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@7 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 | 
 | 
tested with Examples 7 and 8 from Massart!
I need to compare with the DIN and draper examples, and finish
the package vignette.
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@6 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 | 
 | 
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@1 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
 |