Add error model algorithm to output

1 files changed, 64 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
index 3e8d20ef..bb94fd11 100644
--- a/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
+++ b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
@@ -37,7 +37,30 @@
  and advance error model specifications. The fact that these data and some
  results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of
  pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by
- data protection regulations." />
+ data protection regulations.
+Preprocessing of data was performed based on the recommendations of the FOCUS
+ kinetics workgroup (FOCUS, 2014) as described below.
+Datasets 1 and 2 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for imazamox
+ (France, 2015, p. 15). For setting values reported as zero, an LOQ of 0.1
+ was assumed. Metabolite residues reported for day zero were added to the
+ parent compound residues.
+Datasets 3 and 4 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for isofetamid
+ (Belgium, 2014, p. 8) and show the data for two different radiolabels. For
+ dataset 4, the value given for the metabolite in the day zero sampling
+ in replicate B was added to the parent compound, following the respective
+ FOCUS recommendation.
+Dataset 5 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for ethofumesate
+ (Austria, 2015, p. 16).
+Datasets 6 to 10 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for glyphosate
+ (Germany, 2013a, pages 8, 28, 50, 51). For the initial sampling,
+ the residues given for the metabolite were added to the parent
+ value, following the recommendation of the FOCUS kinetics workgroup.
+Dataset 11 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for 2,4-D
+ (Germany, 2013b, p. 644). Values reported as zero were set to NA, with
+ the exception of the day three sampling of metabolite A2, which was set
+ to one half of the LOD reported to be 1% AR.
+Dataset 12 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for thifensulfuron-methyl
+ (United Kingdom, 2014, p. 81)." />
 <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary" />
 
 
@@ -139,6 +162,29 @@
  results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of
  pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by
  data protection regulations.</p>
+<p>Preprocessing of data was performed based on the recommendations of the FOCUS
+ kinetics workgroup (FOCUS, 2014) as described below.</p>
+<p>Datasets 1 and 2 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for imazamox
+ (France, 2015, p. 15). For setting values reported as zero, an LOQ of 0.1
+ was assumed. Metabolite residues reported for day zero were added to the
+ parent compound residues.</p>
+<p>Datasets 3 and 4 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for isofetamid
+ (Belgium, 2014, p. 8) and show the data for two different radiolabels. For
+ dataset 4, the value given for the metabolite in the day zero sampling
+ in replicate B was added to the parent compound, following the respective
+ FOCUS recommendation.</p>
+<p>Dataset 5 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for ethofumesate
+ (Austria, 2015, p. 16).</p>
+<p>Datasets 6 to 10 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for glyphosate
+ (Germany, 2013a, pages 8, 28, 50, 51). For the initial sampling,
+ the residues given for the metabolite were added to the parent
+ value, following the recommendation of the FOCUS kinetics workgroup.</p>
+<p>Dataset 11 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for 2,4-D
+ (Germany, 2013b, p. 644). Values reported as zero were set to NA, with
+ the exception of the day three sampling of metabolite A2, which was set
+ to one half of the LOD reported to be 1% AR.</p>
+<p>Dataset 12 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for thifensulfuron-methyl
+ (United Kingdom, 2014, p. 81).</p>
     
     </div>
 
@@ -154,8 +200,24 @@
     
     <h2 class="hasAnchor" id="source"><a class="anchor" href="#source"></a>Source</h2>
 
-    <p>Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise
+    
+    <p>Austria (2015). Ethofumesate Renewal Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS)</p>
+<p>Belgium (2014). Isofetamid (IKF-5411) Draft Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS)</p>
+<p>France (2015). Imazamox Draft Renewal Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS)</p>
+<p>FOCUS (2014) &#8220;Generic guidance for Estimating Persistence and
+  Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU
+  Registration&#8221; Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics,
+  Version 1.1, 18 December 2014
+  <a href='http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics'>http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics</a></p>
+<p>Germany (2013a). Renewal Assessment Report Glyphosate Volume 3 Annex B.8: Environmental Fate
+  and Behaviour</p>
+<p>Germany (2013b). Renewal Assessment Report 2,4-D Volume 3 Annex B.8: Fate and behaviour in the
+  environment</p>
+<p>Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise
   written for the German Umweltbundesamt.</p>
+<p>United Kingdom (2014). Thifensulfuron-methyl - Annex B.8 (Volume 3) to the Report and Proposed
+  Decision of the United Kingdom made to the European Commission under Regulation (EC) No.
+  1141/2010 for renewal of an active substance</p>
     
 
     <h2 class="hasAnchor" id="examples"><a class="anchor" href="#examples"></a>Examples</h2>