Update DESCRIPTION and NEWS, check and test

2 files changed, 20 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/log/check.log b/log/check.log
index 3fea2ec6..7aa4610c 100644
--- a/log/check.log
+++ b/log/check.log
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Maintainer: ‘Johannes Ranke <johannes.ranke@jrwb.de>’
 * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
 * checking replacement functions ... OK
 * checking foreign function calls ... OK
-* checking R code for possible problems ... [14s/14s] OK
+* checking R code for possible problems ... [18s/18s] OK
 * checking Rd files ... OK
 * checking Rd metadata ... OK
 * checking Rd line widths ... OK
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Maintainer: ‘Johannes Ranke <johannes.ranke@jrwb.de>’
 * checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK
 * checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
 * checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
-* checking examples ... [15s/15s] OK
+* checking examples ... [20s/20s] OK
 * checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
 * checking tests ... SKIPPED
 * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log
index eb8d6b9a..b305bf58 100644
--- a/log/test.log
+++ b/log/test.log
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
 ℹ Testing mkin
 ✔ | F W S  OK | Context
 ✔ |         5 | AIC calculation
-✔ |         5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.7s]
+✔ |         5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.5s]
 ✔ |         5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
 ✔ |         3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
 ✔ |        12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.1s]
-✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [37.5s]
+✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [34.5s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
 Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [5.5s]
+✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [5.3s]
 ✔ |         5 | Time step normalisation
-✔ |         4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.7s]
-✔ |        14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.9s]
+✔ |         4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s]
+✔ |        14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
 ✔ |         4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.4s]
-✔ |         1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.3s]
-✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [27.2s]
+✔ |         1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s]
+✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [25.6s]
 ✔ |     1  12 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [0.4s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_mixed.R:74'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
@@ -24,30 +24,30 @@ Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 ✔ |         3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg
 ✔ |        10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.6s]
-✔ |         3 | mkinfit features [0.8s]
+✔ |         3 | mkinfit features [0.7s]
 ✔ |         8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s]
 ✔ |         3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s]
-✔ |         9 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [45.7s]
-✔ |        16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.7s]
-✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [10.3s]
-✔ |        16 | Plotting [11.4s]
+✔ |         9 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [40.2s]
+✔ |        16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.6s]
+✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [9.5s]
+✔ |        16 | Plotting [10.5s]
 ✔ |         4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
-✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [75.4s]
+✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [69.8s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
 Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 ✔ |         2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.6s]
 ✔ |        11 | Processing of residue series
-✔ |        10 | Fitting the SFORB model [4.2s]
+✔ |        10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.9s]
 ✔ |         1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
 ✔ |         5 | Summary [0.2s]
-✔ |         4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.5s]
-✔ |         9 | Hypothesis tests [9.6s]
-✔ |         4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.4s]
+✔ |         4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.3s]
+✔ |         9 | Hypothesis tests [8.5s]
+✔ |         4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.3s]
 
 ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 245.9 s
+Duration: 225.9 s
 
 ── Skipped tests  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)