diff options
| author | Ranke Johannes <johannes.ranke@agroscope.admin.ch> | 2026-09-07 13:45:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ranke Johannes <johannes.ranke@agroscope.admin.ch> | 2026-09-07 13:45:39 +0200 |
| commit | 48d9cad339394c3aa0d730d9a27b1c0680ce13e8 (patch) | |
| tree | 9c0a5766f3d0853c382ba0174f83e2e8ac9b0fbf /man/DTx.Rd | |
| parent | 46735d7a6d429bb0c50f951763797f321a0d77ca (diff) | |
The tolerance of one test had to be increased in test_deSolve.R,
and four vdiffr snapshots with negligible differences were updated.
Tests run with a maximum of 16 cores when running in the Agroscope
Apptainer environment.
Diffstat (limited to 'man/DTx.Rd')
| -rw-r--r-- | man/DTx.Rd | 26 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/man/DTx.Rd b/man/DTx.Rd new file mode 100644 index 00000000..67dba5d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/DTx.Rd @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand +% Please edit documentation in R/endpoints.R +\name{DTx} +\alias{DTx} +\title{Calculate DTx from parameters of parent degradation models} +\usage{ +DTx(type = c("SFO", "FOMC", "DFOP", "HS", "SFORB"), parms, exact = FALSE) +} +\arguments{ +\item{type}{Character string specifying the degradation model} + +\item{parms}{Named numeric vector giving the kinetic parameters} + +\item{exact}{Should we used log(10)/log(2) instead of the widely used value +of 3.32 for backcalculation of DT50 values from DT90 values?} +} +\description{ +Calculate DTx from parameters of parent degradation models +} +\examples{ +# Check what type of DT50 is given in the bixafen EFSA conclusion from 2012 on p. 42 +DTx("HS", parms = c(k1 = 0.0081, k2 = 0.00023, tb = 53)) +# We get 1200 days for the time the concentration reaches 50\%, the value of 1235 +# was likely based on more digits for the parameters. The half-life corresponding +# to the slow phase is around 3000 days +} |
