diff options
| author | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2022-05-18 21:26:17 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2022-05-18 21:26:17 +0200 |
| commit | 91c5db736a4d3f2290a0cc5698fb4e35ae7bda59 (patch) | |
| tree | 8e9e34d18f055936172329c1248e6e2ff136bff9 /vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd | |
| parent | ea57db98cef3fb882f7bd9656b44f270e7bded38 (diff) | |
Remove outdated comment in FOCUS L vignette, update docs
This also adds the first benchmark results obtained on my laptop system
Diffstat (limited to 'vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd')
| -rw-r--r-- | vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd | 4 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd b/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd index 96239051..6871760c 100644 --- a/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd +++ b/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd @@ -175,9 +175,7 @@ summary(m.L2.DFOP, data = FALSE) ``` Here, the DFOP model is clearly the best-fit model for dataset L2 based on the -chi^2 error level criterion. However, the failure to calculate the covariance -matrix indicates that the parameter estimates correlate excessively. Therefore, -the FOMC model may be preferred for this dataset. +chi^2 error level criterion. # Laboratory Data L3 |