1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
|
# mkin
<!-- badges: start -->
[![](https://www.r-pkg.org/badges/version/mkin)](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mkin)
[![mkin status badge](https://jranke.r-universe.dev/badges/mkin)](https://jranke.r-universe.dev/ui/#package:mkin)
[![Build Status](https://app.travis-ci.com/jranke/mkin.svg?token=Sq9VuYWyRz2FbBLxu6DK&branch=main)](https://app.travis-ci.com/jranke/mkin)
[![Codecov test coverage](https://codecov.io/gh/jranke/mkin/branch/main/graph/badge.svg)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jranke/mkin?branch=main)
<!-- badges: end -->
The [R](https://www.r-project.org) package **mkin** provides calculation routines for the analysis of
chemical degradation data, including <b>m</b>ulticompartment <b>kin</b>etics as
needed for modelling the formation and decline of transformation products, or
if several degradation compartments are involved. It provides stable functionality
for kinetic evaluations according to the FOCUS guidance (see below for details).
In addition, it provides functionality to do hierarchical kinetics based on
nonlinear mixed-effects models.
## Installation
You can install the latest released version from
[CRAN](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mkin) from within R:
```r
install.packages("mkin")
```
## Background
In the regulatory evaluation of chemical substances like plant protection
products (pesticides), biocides and other chemicals, degradation data play an
important role. For the evaluation of pesticide degradation experiments,
detailed guidance and various helpful tools have been developed as detailed in
'Credits and historical remarks' below. This package aims to provide a one
stop solution for degradation kinetics, addressing modellers that are willing
to, or even prefer to work with R.
## Basic usage
For a start, have a look at the code examples provided for
[`plot.mkinfit`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/plot.mkinfit.html)
and
[`plot.mmkin`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/plot.mmkin.html), and
at the package vignettes
[`FOCUS L`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/articles/FOCUS_L.html) and
[`FOCUS D`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/articles/FOCUS_D.html).
## Documentation
The HTML documentation of the latest version released to CRAN is available at
[jrwb.de](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/) and
[github](https://jranke.github.io/mkin/).
Documentation of the development
version is found in the ['dev' subdirectory](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/dev/).
In the articles section of this documentation, you can also find demonstrations
of the application of nonlinear hierarchical models, also known as nonlinear
mixed-effects models, to more complex data, including transformation products
and covariates.
## Features
### General
* Highly flexible model specification using
[`mkinmod`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/mkinmod.html),
including equilibrium reactions and using the single first-order reversible
binding (SFORB) model, which will automatically create two state variables
for the observed variable.
* Model solution (forward modelling) in the function
[`mkinpredict`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/mkinpredict.html)
is performed either using the analytical solution for the case of
parent only degradation or some simple models involving a single transformation
product, , an eigenvalue based solution if only simple first-order (SFO) or
SFORB kinetics are used in the model, or using a numeric solver from the
`deSolve` package (default is `lsoda`).
* The usual one-sided t-test for significant difference from zero is
shown based on estimators for the untransformed parameters.
* Summary and plotting functions. The `summary` of an `mkinfit` object is in
fact a full report that should give enough information to be able to
approximately reproduce the fit with other tools.
* The chi-squared error level as defined in the FOCUS kinetics guidance
(see below) is calculated for each observed variable.
* The 'variance by variable' error model which is often fitted using
Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) can be specified as
`error_model = "obs"`.
### Unique in mkin
* Three different error models can be selected using the argument `error_model`
to the [`mkinfit`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/mkinfit.html)
function. A two-component error model similar to the one proposed by
[Rocke and Lorenzato](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/sigma_twocomp.html)
can be selected using the argument `error_model = "tc"`.
* Model comparisons using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) are supported
which can also be used for non-constant variance. In such cases the FOCUS
chi-squared error level is not meaningful.
* By default, kinetic rate constants and kinetic formation fractions are
transformed internally using
[`transform_odeparms`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/transform_odeparms.html)
so their estimators can more reasonably be expected to follow
a normal distribution.
* When parameter estimates are backtransformed to match the model definition,
confidence intervals calculated from standard errors are also backtransformed
to the correct scale, and will not include meaningless values like negative
rate constants or formation fractions adding up to more than 1, which cannot
occur in a single experiment with a single defined radiolabel position.
* When a metabolite decline phase is not described well by SFO kinetics,
SFORB kinetics can be used for the metabolite. Mathematically, the SFORB model
is equivalent to the DFOP model. However, the SFORB model has the advantage
that there is a mechanistic interpretation of the model parameters.
* Nonlinear mixed-effects models (hierarchical models) can be created from fits
of the same degradation model to different datasets for the same compound by
using the
[nlme.mmkin](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/nlme.mmkin.html) and
[saem.mmkin](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/saem.html)
methods. Note that the convergence of the nlme fits depends on the quality of
the data. Convergence is better for simple models and data for many groups
(e.g. soils). The saem method uses the `saemix` package as a backend. Analytical
solutions suitable for use with this package have been implemented for parent
only models and the most important models including one metabolite (SFO-SFO
and DFOP-SFO). Fitting other models with `saem.mmkin`, while it makes use
of the compiled ODE models that mkin provides, has longer run times (from a couple
of minutes to more than an hour).
### Performance
* Parallel fitting of several models to several datasets is supported, see for
example
[`plot.mmkin`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/reference/plot.mmkin.html).
* If a C compiler is installed, the kinetic models are compiled from automatically
generated C code, see
[vignette `compiled_models`](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/articles/web_only/compiled_models.html).
The autogeneration of C code was
inspired by the [`ccSolve`](https://github.com/karlines/ccSolve) package. Thanks
to Karline Soetaert for her work on that.
* Even if no compiler is installed, many degradation models still give
[very good performance](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/mkin/articles/web_only/benchmarks.html),
as current versions of mkin also have [analytical solutions for some models
with one metabolite](https://jrwb.de/performance-improvements-mkin/), and if
SFO or SFORB are used for the parent compound, Eigenvalue based solutions of
the degradation model are available.
## GUI
There is a graphical user interface that may be useful. Please
refer to its [documentation page](https://pkgdown.jrwb.de/gmkin/)
for installation instructions and a manual. It only supports
evaluations using (generalised) nonlinear regression, but
not simultaneous fits using nonlinear mixed-effects models.
## News
There is a list of changes for the latest [CRAN release](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mkin/news/news.html)
and one for each github branch, e.g. [the main branch](https://github.com/jranke/mkin/blob/main/NEWS.md).
## Credits and historical remarks
`mkin` would not be possible without the underlying software stack consisting of,
among others, R and the package [deSolve](https://cran.r-project.org/package=deSolve).
In previous version, `mkin` was also using the functionality of the
[FME](https://cran.r-project.org/package=FME) package. Please refer to the
[package page on CRAN](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mkin) for the full list
of imported and suggested R packages. Also, [Debian Linux](https://debian.org),
the vim editor and the [Nvim-R](https://github.com/jalvesaq/Nvim-R) plugin have
been invaluable in its development.
`mkin` could not have been written without me being introduced to regulatory fate
modelling of pesticides by Adrian Gurney during my time at Harlan Laboratories
Ltd (formerly RCC Ltd). `mkin` greatly profits from and largely follows
the work done by the
[FOCUS Degradation Kinetics Workgroup](http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics),
as detailed in their guidance document from 2006, slightly updated in 2011 and
in 2014.
Also, it was inspired by the first version of KinGUI developed by
BayerCropScience, which is based on the MatLab runtime environment.
The companion package
[kinfit](http://kinfit.r-forge.r-project.org/kinfit_static/index.html) (now deprecated) was
[started in 2008](https://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php?view=rev&root=kinfit&revision=2) and
[first published](https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/kinfit/) on
CRAN on 01 May 2010.
The first `mkin` code was
[published on 11 May 2010](https://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php?view=rev&root=kinfit&revision=8) and the
[first CRAN version](https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/mkin/)
on 18 May 2010.
In 2011, Bayer Crop Science started to distribute an R based successor to KinGUI named
KinGUII whose R code is based on `mkin`, but which added, among other
refinements, a closed source graphical user interface (GUI), iteratively
reweighted least squares (IRLS) optimisation of the variance for each of the
observed variables, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation
functionality, similar to what is available e.g. in the `FME` package.
Somewhat in parallel, Syngenta has sponsored the development of an `mkin` and
KinGUII based GUI application called CAKE, which also adds IRLS and MCMC, is
more limited in the model formulation, but puts more weight on usability.
CAKE is available for download from the [CAKE
website](https://cake-kinetics.org), where you can also
find a zip archive of the R scripts derived from `mkin`, published under the GPL
license.
Finally, there is
[KineticEval](https://github.com/zhenglei-gao/KineticEval), which contains
some further development of the scripts used for KinGUII.
Thanks to René Lehmann, formerly working at the Umweltbundesamt, for the nice
cooperation on parameter transformations, especially the isometric log-ratio
transformation that is now used for formation fractions in case there are more
than two transformation targets.
Many inspirations for improvements of mkin resulted from doing kinetic evaluations
of degradation data for my clients while working at Harlan Laboratories and
at Eurofins Regulatory AG, and now as an independent consultant.
Funding was received from the Umweltbundesamt in the course of the projects
- Project Number 27452 (Testing and validation of modelling software as an alternative
to ModelMaker 4.0, 2014-2015)
- Project Number 56703 (Optimization of gmkin for routine use in the Umweltbundesamt, 2015)
- Project Number 92570 (Update of Project Number 27452, 2017-2018)
- Project Number 112407 (Testing the feasibility of using an error model
according to Rocke and Lorenzato for more realistic parameter estimates in
the kinetic evaluation of degradation data, 2018-2019)
- Project Number 120667 (Development of objective criteria for the evaluation
of the visual fit in the kinetic evaluation of degradation data, 2019-2020)
- Project Number 146839 (Checking the feasibility of using mixed-effects models for
the derivation of kinetic modelling parameters from degradation studies, 2020-2021)
- Project Number 173340 (Application of nonlinear hierarchical models to the
kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data)
Thanks to everyone involved for collaboration and support!
Thanks are due also to Emmanuelle Comets, maintainer of the saemix package, for
her interest and support for using the SAEM algorithm and its implementation in
saemix for the evaluation of chemical degradation data.
Regarding the application of nonlinear mixed-effects models to degradation data,
von Götz et al (1999) have already proposed to use this technique in the context
of environmental risk assessments of pesticides. However, this work was
apparently not followed up, which is why we had to independently arrive at the
idea and missed to cite this previous work on the topic in our first publications.
## References
<table>
<tr><td>Ranke J (2023) Application of nonlinear hierarchical models to the
kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data - Guidance for the use
of an R markdown template file.
<a href='https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/application-of-nonlinear-hierarchical-models-to-the'>Umweltbundesamt TEXTE 151/2023</a>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Schmidt J, and Comets E (2021)
Taking kinetic evaluations of degradation data to the next level with nonlinear mixed-effects models.
<i>Environments</i>
<b>8</b> (8) 71
<a href='https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080071'>doi:10.3390/environments8080071</a>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>Ranke J, Meinecke S (2019)
Error Models for the Kinetic Evaluation of Chemical Degradation Data
<i>Environments</i>
<b>6</b> (12) 124
<a href='https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6120124'>doi:10.3390/environments6120124</a>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Meinecke S (2018)
Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data
<i>Environmental Sciences Europe</i>
<b>30</b> 17
<a href='https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1'>doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1</a>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>Von Götz N, Nörtersheuser P, Richter O (1999)
Population based analysis of pesticide kinetics
<i>Chemosphere</i>
<b>38</b> 7
<a href='https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00388-9'>doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00388-9</a>
</td></tr>
</table>
## Development
Contributions are welcome!
|