aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man/PEC_soil.Rd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2016-09-27 23:00:48 +0200
committerJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2016-09-27 23:00:48 +0200
commit12a31f4c130c551f82232d9ef7dfb608bd52c53f (patch)
tree2525ab1ea4102a6edddbd0c2f03f4a851bf2f9c5 /man/PEC_soil.Rd
parent0d958ab6f84b569b5437f231c56004890c4ae23b (diff)
Reorganise repository using standard package layout
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_soil.Rd')
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_soil.Rd119
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_soil.Rd b/man/PEC_soil.Rd
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c0b5201
--- /dev/null
+++ b/man/PEC_soil.Rd
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand
+% Please edit documentation in R/PEC_soil.R
+\name{PEC_soil}
+\alias{PEC_soil}
+\title{Calculate predicted environmental concentrations in soil}
+\usage{
+PEC_soil(rate, rate_units = "g/ha", interception = 0, mixing_depth = 5,
+ PEC_units = "mg/kg", PEC_pw_units = "mg/L", interval = NA,
+ n_periods = Inf, tillage_depth = 20, chent = NA, DT50 = NA,
+ Koc = NA, Kom = Koc/1.724, t_avg = 0, scenarios = c("default",
+ "EFSA_2015"), porewater = FALSE)
+}
+\arguments{
+\item{rate}{Application rate in units specified below}
+
+\item{rate_units}{Defaults to g/ha}
+
+\item{interception}{The fraction of the application rate that does not reach the soil}
+
+\item{mixing_depth}{Mixing depth in cm}
+
+\item{PEC_units}{Requested units for the calculated PEC. Only mg/kg currently supported}
+
+\item{PEC_pw_units}{Only mg/L currently supported}
+
+\item{interval}{Period of the deeper mixing, defaults to 365, which is a year if
+rate units are in days}
+
+\item{n_periods}{Number of periods to be considered for long term PEC calculations}
+
+\item{tillage_depth}{Periodic (see interval) deeper mixing in cm}
+
+\item{chent}{An optional chent object holding substance specific information. Can
+also be a name for the substance as a character string}
+
+\item{DT50}{If specified, overrides soil DT50 endpoints from a chent object
+If DT50 is not specified here and not available from the chent object, zero
+degradation is assumed}
+
+\item{Koc}{If specified, overrides Koc endpoints from a chent object}
+
+\item{Kom}{Calculated from Koc by default, but can explicitly be specified
+as Kom here}
+
+\item{t_avg}{Averaging times for time weighted average concentrations}
+
+\item{scenarios}{If this is 'default', the DT50 will be used without correction
+and soil properties as specified in the REACH guidance (R.16, Table
+R.16-9) are used for porewater PEC calculations. If this is "EFSA_2015",
+the DT50 is taken to be a modelling half-life at 20°C and pF2 (for when
+'chents' is specified, the DegT50 with destination 'PECgw' will be used),
+and corrected using an Arrhenius activation energy of 65.4 kJ/mol. Also
+model and scenario adjustment factors from the EFSA guidance are used.}
+
+\item{porewater}{Should equilibrium porewater concentrations be estimated
+based on Kom and the organic carbon fraction of the soil instead of total
+soil concentrations? Based on equation (7) given in the PPR panel opinion
+(EFSA 2012, p. 24) and the scenarios specified in the EFSA guidance (2015,
+p. 13).}
+}
+\value{
+The predicted concentration in soil
+}
+\description{
+This is a basic calculation of a contaminant concentration in bulk soil
+based on complete, instantaneous mixing. If an interval is given, an
+attempt is made at calculating a long term maximum concentration using
+the concepts layed out for example in the PPR panel opinion (EFSA 2012).
+}
+\details{
+This assumes that the complete load to soil during the time specified by
+'interval' (typically 365 days) is dosed at once. As in the PPR panel
+opinion cited below (PPR panel 2012), only temperature correction using the
+Arrhenius equation is performed.
+
+Total soil and porewater PEC values for the scenarios as defined in the EFSA
+guidance (2015, p. 13) can easily be calculated.
+}
+\note{
+If temperature information is available in the selected scenarios, as
+ e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling
+ (destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50
+ with destination 'PECsoil'.
+}
+\examples{
+PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25)
+
+# This is example 1 starting at p. 79 of the EFSA guidance (2015)
+PEC_soil(1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_avg = c(0, 21),
+ scenarios = "EFSA_2015")
+PEC_soil(1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_av = c(0, 21),
+ Kom = 1000, scenarios = "EFSA_2015", porewater = TRUE)
+
+# The following is from example 4 starting at p. 85 of the EFSA guidance (2015)
+# Metabolite M2
+# Calculate total and porewater soil concentrations for tier 1 scenarios
+# Relative molar mass is 100/300, formation fraction is 0.7 * 1
+results_pfm <- PEC_soil(100/300 * 0.7 * 1 * 1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_avg = c(0, 21),
+ scenarios = "EFSA_2015")
+results_pfm_pw <- PEC_soil(100/300 * 0.7 * 1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_av = c(0, 21),
+ Kom = 100, scenarios = "EFSA_2015", porewater = TRUE)
+}
+\author{
+Johannes Ranke
+}
+\references{
+EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012)
+ Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario
+ selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental
+ concentrations of plant protection products in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal}
+ \bold{10}(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562
+
+ EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) EFSA guidance document for
+ predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant
+ protection products and transformation products of these active substances
+ in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{13}(4) 4093
+ doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093
+}
+

Contact - Imprint