diff options
author | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2019-09-27 10:00:15 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2019-09-27 11:08:53 +0200 |
commit | 435e07a6f7fd2599d783fd306ee6d9e08acc0c6b (patch) | |
tree | bd47fa18a307349eabf4ecfff7ea8da81f5bb654 /man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd | |
parent | 803fe13e505960fddccdbd4dcb524715f5eb068d (diff) |
Fix for UK drainage, some EFSA interception and washoff
- PEC_sw_drainage_UK() gave results that were a little bit too high
for the substances with the highest Koc (>4000), as I used 0.01% instead
of 0.008% for them. This must have come from an old vesion of the UK
data requirements handbook, at least I do not have another explanation
- Add EFSA interception (from 2014 DegT50 guidance) and tier 1
crop wash-off factors (from 2017 PEC soil guidance) for some major
arable crops
- Update docs
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd')
-rw-r--r-- | man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd index edb239e..c9f8ed4 100644 --- a/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd +++ b/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ published on the CRC website \examples{ PEC_sw_drainage_UK(150, Koc = 100) } +\references{ +HSE's Chemicals Regulation Division (CRD) Active substance + PECsw calculations (for UK specific authorisation requests) + \url{https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/data-requirements-handbook/fate/active-substance-uk.htm} + accessed 2019-09-27 + + Drainage PECs Version 1.0 (2015) Spreadsheet published at + \url{https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/data-requirements-handbook/fate/pec-tools-2015/PEC\%20sw-sed\%20(drainage).xlsx} + accessed 2019-09-27 +} \author{ Johannes Ranke } |