Fix for UK drainage, some EFSA interception and washoff

- PEC_sw_drainage_UK() gave results that were a little bit too high
for the substances with the highest Koc (>4000), as I used 0.01% instead
of 0.008% for them. This must have come from an old vesion of the UK
data requirements handbook, at least I do not have another explanation

- Add EFSA interception (from 2014 DegT50 guidance) and tier 1
crop wash-off factors (from 2017 PEC soil guidance) for some major
arable crops

- Update docs

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd b/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
index c7fd12d..797332b 100644
--- a/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
+++ b/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
@@ -14,11 +14,22 @@ A list containing the classification and the percentage of the
   compound transported per 10 mm drain water
 }
 \description{
-This implements the method specified in the UK data requirements handbook and was 
+This implements the method specified in the UK data requirements handbook and was
 checked against the spreadsheet published on the CRC website
 }
 \examples{
 SSLRC_mobility_classification(100)
+SSLRC_mobility_classification(10000)
+}
+\references{
+HSE's Chemicals Regulation Division (CRD) Active substance
+  PECsw calculations (for UK specific authorisation requests)
+  \url{https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/data-requirements-handbook/fate/active-substance-uk.htm}
+  accessed 2019-09-27
+
+  Drainage PECs Version 1.0 (2015) Spreadsheet published at
+  \url{https://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/data-requirements-handbook/fate/pec-tools-2015/PEC\%20sw-sed\%20(drainage).xlsx}
+  accessed 2019-09-27
 }
 \author{
 Johannes Ranke