aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2019-02-19 12:27:00 +0100
committerJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2019-02-19 12:27:00 +0100
commit72c56f4246966c1bea627f601cf3cc457734f023 (patch)
tree7e08e8440129cda3ea8280a6c6934618d93a1594 /tests
parente5a077e28153f6494c99d6945b8b1bd239464609 (diff)
Add German drainage calculations using Exposit 3.02
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/testthat/test_PEC_soil.R14
-rw-r--r--tests/testthat/test_exposit.R80
2 files changed, 75 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_soil.R b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_soil.R
index 6e4e30b..810389f 100644
--- a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_soil.R
+++ b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_soil.R
@@ -132,15 +132,21 @@ test_that("Long term FOMC PEC soil from ESCAPE can be reproduced", {
# Application of 100 g/ha with 25% interception and FOMC degradation type a
fomc_50_a <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 1, beta = 10),
interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20, n_periods = 50)
- fomc_long_a <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 1, beta = 10),
- interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20)
+ expect_warning(
+ fomc_long_a <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 1, beta = 10),
+ interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20),
+ "pseudo-plateau"
+ )
# Application of 100 g/ha with 25% interception and FOMC degradation type b
# The long term PEC is much lower than when adding FOMC curves for 50 years
fomc_50_b <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 0.5, beta = 20),
interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20, n_periods = 50)
- fomc_long_b <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 0.5, beta = 20),
- interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20)
+ expect_warning(
+ fomc_long_b <- PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25, FOMC = c(alpha = 0.5, beta = 20),
+ interval = 365, tillage_depth = 20),
+ "pseudo-plateau"
+ )
expect_true(fomc_50_b > fomc_long_b)
diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R b/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R
index 667b4ee..f6a2de4 100644
--- a/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R
+++ b/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R
@@ -1,25 +1,75 @@
library(pfm)
-context("Exposit runoff calculations")
+context("Exposit calculations")
+# Expected results are from the Exposit 3.02, downloaded 2019-02-15
-test_that("Runoff PECsw are as in Exposit 3.01", {
- # Expected results are from the Exposit 3.01, downloaded 2017-10-27
+test_that("Runoff PECsw are as in Exposit 3.02", {
+ # 100 g/ha, Koc = 1000 L/kg, DT50 = 1000 days
+ res_exposit_1 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = c(183.62, 110.17, 73.45, 36.72),
+ erosion = c(19.96, 11.98, 2.99, 1.00),
+ PEC_dissolved = c(0.71, 0.61, 0.52, 0.37),
+ PEC_total = c(0.78, 0.68, 0.55, 0.38))
+
+ res_1 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(100, Koc = 1000, DT50 = 1000)
+ res_pfm_1 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = round(1000 * res_1$runoff["dissolved"], 2),
+ erosion = round(1000 * res_1$runoff["bound"], 2),
+ PEC_dissolved = round(res_1$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"],
+ PEC_total = round(res_1$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_1$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2))
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_1, res_pfm_1)
+
+ # 10 g/ha, Koc = 300000 L/kg, DT50 = 10 days
+ res_exposit_2 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = c(0.08, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02),
+ erosion = c(36.63, 21.98, 5.49, 1.83),
+ PEC_dissolved = c(0, 0, 0, 0),
+ PEC_total = c(0.14, 0.12, 0.04, 0.02))
+ res_2 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(10, Koc = 300000, DT50 = 10)
+ res_pfm_2 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = round(1000 * res_2$runoff["dissolved"], 2),
+ erosion = round(1000 * res_2$runoff["bound"], 2),
+ PEC_dissolved = round(res_2$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"],
+ PEC_total = round(res_2$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_2$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2))
+
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_2, res_pfm_2)
+
+ # 200 g/ha, Koc = 30 L/kg, DT50 = 100 days
+ res_exposit_3 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = c(295.78, 177.47, 118.31, 59.16),
+ erosion = rep(0.00, 4),
+ PEC_dissolved = c(1.14, 0.99, 0.85, 0.59),
+ PEC_total = c(1.14, 0.99, 0.85, 0.59))
+
+ res_3 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(200, Koc = 30, DT50 = 100)
+ res_pfm_3 <- data.frame(
+ runoff = round(1000 * res_3$runoff["dissolved"], 2),
+ erosion = round(1000 * res_3$runoff["bound"], 2),
+ PEC_dissolved = round(res_3$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"],
+ PEC_total = round(res_3$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_3$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2))
+
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_3, res_pfm_3)
+})
+
+test_that("Drainage PECsw are as in Exposit 3.02", {
# 100 g/ha, Koc = 1000 L/kg, DT50 = 1000 days
- PEC_spreadsheet_1 <- data.frame(dissolved = c(0.706, 0.612, 0.525, 0.367),
- total = c(0.783, 0.679, 0.546, 0.377))
+ res_exposit_1 <- c(spring = 0.02, autumn = 0.05)
- PEC_pfm_1 <- round(PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(100, Koc = 1000, DT50 = 1000)$PEC_sw_runoff, 3)[c("dissolved", "total")]
- expect_equivalent(PEC_spreadsheet_1, PEC_pfm_1)
+ res_1 <- PEC_sw_exposit_drainage(100, Koc = 1000, DT50 = 1000)
+ res_pfm_1 <- round(res_1$PEC_sw_drainage, 2)
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_1, res_pfm_1)
# 10 g/ha, Koc = 300000 L/kg, DT50 = 10 days
- PEC_spreadsheet_2 <- data.frame(dissolved = c(0, 0, 0, 0),
- total = c(0.141, 0.122, 0.039, 0.018))
- PEC_pfm_2 <- round(PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(10, Koc = 300000, DT50 = 10)$PEC_sw_runoff, 3)[c("dissolved", "total")]
- expect_equivalent(PEC_spreadsheet_2, PEC_pfm_2)
+ res_exposit_2 <- c(spring = 0.00, autumn = 0.00)
+
+ res_2 <- PEC_sw_exposit_drainage(10, Koc = 300000, DT50 = 10)
+ res_pfm_2 <- round(res_2$PEC_sw_drainage, 2)
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_2, res_pfm_2)
# 200 g/ha, Koc = 30 L/kg, DT50 = 100 days
- PEC_spreadsheet_3 <- data.frame(dissolved = c(1.138, 0.986, 0.845, 0.592),
- total = c(1.138, 0.986, 0.845, 0.592))
- PEC_pfm_3 <- round(PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(200, Koc = 30, DT50 = 100)$PEC_sw_runoff, 3)[c("dissolved", "total")]
- expect_equivalent(PEC_spreadsheet_3, PEC_pfm_3)
+ res_exposit_3 <- c(spring = 0.61, autumn = 1.88)
+
+ res_3 <- PEC_sw_exposit_drainage(200, Koc = 30, DT50 = 100)
+ res_pfm_3 <- round(res_3$PEC_sw_drainage, 2)
+ expect_equivalent(res_exposit_3, res_pfm_3)
})

Contact - Imprint