aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--DESCRIPTION2
-rw-r--r--man/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/GUS.Rd9
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_soil.Rd7
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_drift.Rd3
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_sed.Rd3
-rw-r--r--man/SFO_actual_twa.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/TOXSWA_cwa.Rd3
-rw-r--r--man/drift_data_JKI.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/endpoint.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/geomean.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/pfm_degradation.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/plot.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/read.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd1
-rw-r--r--man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd1
17 files changed, 12 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/DESCRIPTION b/DESCRIPTION
index cfef009..7207ca4 100644
--- a/DESCRIPTION
+++ b/DESCRIPTION
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ License: GPL
LazyLoad: yes
LazyData: yes
Encoding: UTF-8
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
+RoxygenNote: 5.0.1.9000
diff --git a/man/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.Rd b/man/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.Rd
index 3ae151b..f2417d9 100644
--- a/man/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.Rd
+++ b/man/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.Rd
@@ -14,4 +14,3 @@ FOCUS (2012) Generic guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS ground water assessments. Version
FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticde fate models and their USe.
http://focus.jrc.ec.europa.eu/gw/docs/Generic_guidance_FOCV2_1.pdf
}
-
diff --git a/man/GUS.Rd b/man/GUS.Rd
index f1f5f28..edf61b6 100644
--- a/man/GUS.Rd
+++ b/man/GUS.Rd
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
% Please edit documentation in R/GUS.R
\name{GUS}
\alias{GUS}
-\alias{GUS.chent}
\alias{GUS.numeric}
+\alias{GUS.chent}
\alias{print.GUS_result}
\title{Groundwater ubiquity score based on Gustafson (1989)}
\usage{
@@ -70,12 +70,11 @@ The groundwater ubiquity score GUS is calculated according to
the following equation
\deqn{GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})}{GUS = log10 DT50soil * (4 - log10 Koc)}
}
-\author{
-Johannes Ranke
-}
\references{
Gustafson, David I. (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple
method for assessing pesticide leachability. \emph{Environmental
toxicology and chemistry} \bold{8}(4) 339–57.
}
-
+\author{
+Johannes Ranke
+}
diff --git a/man/PEC_soil.Rd b/man/PEC_soil.Rd
index c0b5201..dd780cf 100644
--- a/man/PEC_soil.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_soil.Rd
@@ -100,9 +100,6 @@ results_pfm <- PEC_soil(100/300 * 0.7 * 1 * 1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_
results_pfm_pw <- PEC_soil(100/300 * 0.7 * 1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_av = c(0, 21),
Kom = 100, scenarios = "EFSA_2015", porewater = TRUE)
}
-\author{
-Johannes Ranke
-}
\references{
EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012)
Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario
@@ -116,4 +113,6 @@ EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012)
in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{13}(4) 4093
doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093
}
-
+\author{
+Johannes Ranke
+}
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd
index cb64bde..a968b94 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_drainage_UK.Rd
@@ -36,4 +36,3 @@ PEC_sw_drainage_UK(150, Koc = 100)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_drift.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_drift.Rd
index ae27e82..f74cf67 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_drift.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_drift.Rd
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
\usage{
PEC_sw_drift(rate, applications = 1, water_depth = 30,
drift_percentages = NULL, drift_data = "JKI", crop = "Ackerbau",
- distances = c(1, 5, 10, 20), rate_units = "g/ha", PEC_units = "<U+00B5>g/L")
+ distances = c(1, 5, 10, 20), rate_units = "g/ha", PEC_units = "µg/L")
}
\arguments{
\item{rate}{Application rate in units specified below}
@@ -42,4 +42,3 @@ PEC_sw_drift(100)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_sed.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_sed.Rd
index d0e2ec6..1feb146 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_sed.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_sed.Rd
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ water concentrations}
\usage{
PEC_sw_sed(PEC_sw, percentage = 100, method = "percentage",
sediment_depth = 5, water_depth = 30, sediment_density = 1.3,
- PEC_sed_units = c("<U+00B5>g/kg", "mg/kg"))
+ PEC_sed_units = c("µg/kg", "mg/kg"))
}
\arguments{
\item{PEC_sw}{Numeric vector or matrix of surface water concentrations in µg/L for
@@ -39,4 +39,3 @@ PEC_sw_sed(PEC_sw_drift(100, distances = 1), percentage = 50)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/SFO_actual_twa.Rd b/man/SFO_actual_twa.Rd
index 573ea03..61f95aa 100644
--- a/man/SFO_actual_twa.Rd
+++ b/man/SFO_actual_twa.Rd
@@ -26,4 +26,3 @@ SFO_actual_twa(10)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd b/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
index 04aa01d..c7fd12d 100644
--- a/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
+++ b/man/SSLRC_mobility_classification.Rd
@@ -23,4 +23,3 @@ SSLRC_mobility_classification(100)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/TOXSWA_cwa.Rd b/man/TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
index de87510..7935617 100644
--- a/man/TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
+++ b/man/TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Usually, an instance of this class will be generated by \code{\link{read.TOXSWA_
and areas under the curve in µg/day * h (AUC_max_h) or µg/day * d (AUC_max_d)
for the requested moving window sizes in days.}
}}
+
\section{Methods}{
\describe{
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ for the requested moving window sizes in days.}
}
}
}
+
\examples{
H_sw_R1_stream <- read.TOXSWA_cwa("00003s_pa.cwa",
basedir = "SwashProjects/project_H_sw/TOXSWA",
@@ -55,4 +57,3 @@ H_sw_R1_stream$moving_windows(c(7, 21))
print(H_sw_R1_stream)
}
\keyword{data}
-
diff --git a/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd b/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
index c193c0d..5597b66 100644
--- a/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
+++ b/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
@@ -47,4 +47,3 @@ as its licence is not clear.
drift_data_JKI
}
\keyword{datasets}
-
diff --git a/man/endpoint.Rd b/man/endpoint.Rd
index 0350a51..9511083 100644
--- a/man/endpoint.Rd
+++ b/man/endpoint.Rd
@@ -72,4 +72,3 @@ For the Freundlich exponent, the capital letter \code{N} is used in order to
facilitate dealing with such data in R. In pesticide fate modelling, this
exponent is often called 1/n.
}
-
diff --git a/man/geomean.Rd b/man/geomean.Rd
index ed82294..2887929 100644
--- a/man/geomean.Rd
+++ b/man/geomean.Rd
@@ -28,4 +28,3 @@ geomean(c(1, 3, NA, 9))
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/pfm_degradation.Rd b/man/pfm_degradation.Rd
index 9ab1d0a..0f3cc79 100644
--- a/man/pfm_degradation.Rd
+++ b/man/pfm_degradation.Rd
@@ -32,4 +32,3 @@ head(pfm_degradation("SFO", DT50 = 10))
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/plot.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd b/man/plot.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
index b5f0163..4e81f91 100644
--- a/man/plot.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
+++ b/man/plot.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
@@ -39,4 +39,3 @@ plot(H_sw_D4_pond)
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/read.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd b/man/read.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
index 84ef3da..f1d5908 100644
--- a/man/read.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
+++ b/man/read.TOXSWA_cwa.Rd
@@ -53,4 +53,3 @@ H_sw_D4_pond <- read.TOXSWA_cwa("00001p_pa.cwa",
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
-
diff --git a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
index b45af4a..02c16dc 100644
--- a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
+++ b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
@@ -43,4 +43,3 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.
soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015
}
\keyword{datasets}
-

Contact - Imprint