diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_soil.Rd')
| -rw-r--r-- | man/PEC_soil.Rd | 48 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_soil.Rd b/man/PEC_soil.Rd index e7efd6c..391e25b 100644 --- a/man/PEC_soil.Rd +++ b/man/PEC_soil.Rd @@ -127,16 +127,16 @@ true for the TWA concentrations given for the same example in the EFSA guidance from 2017 (p. 92). According to the EFSA guidance (EFSA, 2017, p. 43), leaching should be - taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth - (here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes - place. However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth - (often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function - is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate. +taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth +(here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes +place. However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth +(often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function +is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate. If temperature information is available in the selected scenarios, as - e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling - (destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50 - with destination 'PECsoil'. +e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling +(destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50 +with destination 'PECsoil'. } \examples{ PEC_soil(100, interception = 0.25) @@ -166,22 +166,22 @@ results_pfm_pw <- PEC_soil(100/300 * 0.7 * 1000, interval = 365, DT50 = 250, t_a } \references{ EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012) - Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario - selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental - concentrations of plant protection products in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} - \bold{10}(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562 - - EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2017) EFSA guidance document for - predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant - protection products and transformation products of these active substances - in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{15}(10) 4982 - doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982 - - EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) EFSA guidance document for - predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant - protection products and transformation products of these active substances - in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{13}(4) 4093 - doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093 +Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario +selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental +concentrations of plant protection products in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} +\bold{10}(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562 + +EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2017) EFSA guidance document for +predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant +protection products and transformation products of these active substances +in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{15}(10) 4982 +doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982 + +EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) EFSA guidance document for +predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant +protection products and transformation products of these active substances +in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{13}(4) 4093 +doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093 } \author{ Johannes Ranke |