diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd')
| -rw-r--r-- | man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd | 9 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd index 13fae38..c73270b 100644 --- a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd +++ b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from } \usage{ PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(rate, interception = 0, Koc, DT50 = Inf, - t_runoff = 3, exposit_reduction_version = c("3.02", "3.01a", "2.0"), - V_ditch = 30, V_event = 100, dilution = 2) + t_runoff = 3, exposit_reduction_version = c("3.02", "3.01a", + "3.01a2", "2.0"), V_ditch = 30, V_event = 100, dilution = 2) } \arguments{ \item{rate}{The application rate in g/ha} @@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(rate, interception = 0, Koc, DT50 = Inf, \item{exposit_reduction_version}{The version of the reduction factors to be used. "3.02" is the current version used in Germany, "3.01a" is the version with additional percentages for 3 m and 6 m buffer -zones used in Switzerland.} +zones used in Switzerland. "3.01a2" is a version introduced for consistency with previous calculations +performed for a 3 m buffer zone in Switzerland, with the same reduction being applied to the dissolved +and the bound fraction.} \item{V_ditch}{The volume of the ditch is assumed to be 1 m * 100 m * 30 cm = 30 m3} @@ -48,6 +50,7 @@ in the worksheet "Konzept Runoff". } \examples{ PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(500, Koc = 150) + PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(600, Koc = 10000, DT50 = 195, exposit = "3.01a") } \seealso{ \code{\link{perc_runoff_exposit}} for runoff loss percentages and \code{\link{perc_runoff_reduction_exposit}} for runoff reduction percentages used |