aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd')
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
index f23423b..973b1fa 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ PEC_sw_focus(
}
\arguments{
\item{parent}{A list containing substance specific parameters, e.g.
-conveniently generated by [chent_focus_sw].}
+conveniently generated by \link{chent_focus_sw}.}
\item{rate}{The application rate in g/ha. Overriden when
applications are given explicitly}
@@ -38,20 +38,20 @@ applications are given explicitly}
\item{comment}{A comment for the input file}
\item{met}{A list containing metabolite specific parameters. e.g.
-conveniently generated by [chent_focus_sw]. If not NULL,
+conveniently generated by \link{chent_focus_sw}. If not NULL,
the PEC is calculated for this compound, not the parent.}
\item{f_drift}{The fraction of the application rate reaching the waterbody
via drift. If NA, this is derived from the scenario name and the number
of applications via the drift data defined by the
-[FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios]}
+\link{FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios}}
\item{f_rd}{The fraction of the amount applied reaching the waterbody via
-runoff/drainage. At Step 1, it is assumed to be 10%, be it the
+runoff/drainage. At Step 1, it is assumed to be 10\%, be it the
parent or a metabolite}
\item{scenario}{The name of the scenario. Must be one of the scenario
-names given in [FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios]}
+names given in \link{FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios}}
\item{region}{'n' for Northern Europe or 's' for Southern Europe. If NA, only
Step 1 PECsw are calculated}
@@ -86,11 +86,11 @@ to be used with the FOCUS calculator.
}
\note{
The formulas for input to the waterbody via runoff/drainage of the
- parent and subsequent formation of the metabolite in water is not
- documented in the model description coming with the calculator. As one would
- expect, this appears to be (as we get the same results) calculated by
- multiplying the application rate with the molar weight
- correction and the formation fraction in water/sediment systems.
+parent and subsequent formation of the metabolite in water is not
+documented in the model description coming with the calculator. As one would
+expect, this appears to be (as we get the same results) calculated by
+multiplying the application rate with the molar weight
+correction and the formation fraction in water/sediment systems.
Step 2 is not implemented.
}
@@ -107,10 +107,10 @@ PEC_sw_focus(new_dummy, 1000, scenario = "cereals, winter", met = M1)
}
\references{
FOCUS (2014) Generic guidance for Surface Water Scenarios (version 1.4).
- FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticde fate models and their USe.
- http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/projects_data/focus/sw/docs/Generic%20FOCUS_SWS_vc1.4.pdf
+FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticde fate models and their USe.
+http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/projects_data/focus/sw/docs/Generic\%20FOCUS_SWS_vc1.4.pdf
Website of the Steps 1 and 2 calculator at the Joint Research
- Center of the European Union:
- http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/stepsonetwo
+Center of the European Union:
+http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/stepsonetwo
}

Contact - Imprint