diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/testthat/test_PEC_sed.R | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/testthat/test_PEC_sw_drift.R | 20 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/testthat/test_exposit.R | 27 |
3 files changed, 36 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sed.R b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sed.R index 443f789..0681adc 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sed.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sed.R @@ -5,5 +5,7 @@ test_that("PEC_sw_sed calculates correctly using the percentage method", { # default assumptions of CRD spreadsheet (5 cm sediment depth, 1.3 kg/L sediment density) # Reference value calculated with CRD spreadsheet PEC_sw_100_1_m <- PEC_sw_drift(100, distances = 1) - expect_equivalent(round(PEC_sw_sed(PEC_sw_100_1_m, percentage = 50), 3), 2.131) + expect_equivalent( + round(PEC_sw_sed(PEC_sw_100_1_m, percentage = 50), 3), + set_units(2.131, "µg/kg")) }) diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sw_drift.R b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sw_drift.R index a0972eb..6177aef 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sw_drift.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_PEC_sw_drift.R @@ -1,22 +1,32 @@ library(pfm) +library(testthat) +library(units) context("Simple PEC surface water calculations with drift entry") test_that("PEC_sw_drift gives the same results as the CRD PEC calculator", { # One application of 30 g/ha to field crops calculated with UK PEC calculator published by CRD - expect_equal(round(PEC_sw_drift(30), 3), - c('1 m' = 0.277, '5 m' = 0.057, '10 m' = 0.029, '20 m' = 0.015)) + expect_equal( + round(PEC_sw_drift(30), 3), + set_units(c('1 m' = 0.277, '5 m' = 0.057, '10 m' = 0.029, '20 m' = 0.015), "\u00B5g/L")) # 7 applications of 30 g/ha to field crops calculated with UK PEC calculator, initial PEC - expect_equal(round(PEC_sw_drift(30, 7), 3), - c('1 m' = 0.161, '5 m' = 0.033, '10 m' = 0.017, '20 m' = 0.008)) + expect_equal( + round(PEC_sw_drift(30, 7), 3), + set_units(c('1 m' = 0.161, '5 m' = 0.033, '10 m' = 0.017, '20 m' = 0.008), "\u00B5g/L")) # 4 applications of 30 g/ha to late fruit crops calculated with UK PEC # calculator published by CRD. CRD uses different drift values from SANCO aquatic # guidance), except for 50 m pfm_30_4_obst_spaet <- round(PEC_sw_drift(30, 4, crop_group_JKI = "Obstbau spaet", distances = c(3, 20, 50)), 3) - crd_30_4_obst_spaet <- c('3 m' = 1.101, '20 m' = 0.080, '50 m' = 0.013) + crd_30_4_obst_spaet <- set_units(c('3 m' = 1.101, '20 m' = 0.080, '50 m' = 0.013), "µg/L") expect_equal(pfm_30_4_obst_spaet[3], crd_30_4_obst_spaet[3]) + + # Synops scenario with 45 m angle. Mean width is 100 cm - (2 * 15 cm). + expect_equal( + PEC_sw_drift(100) * 100/70, + PEC_sw_drift(100, side_angle = 45) + ) }) test_that("The Rautmann formula is correctly implemented", { diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R b/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R index 13371a6..44337bd 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_exposit.R @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ library(pfm) +library(units) +library(dplyr) + context("Exposit calculations") # Expected results are from the Exposit 3.02, downloaded 2019-02-15 @@ -8,12 +11,14 @@ test_that("Runoff PECsw are as in Exposit 3.02", { runoff = c(183.62, 110.17, 73.45, 36.72), erosion = c(19.96, 11.98, 2.99, 1.00), PEC_dissolved = c(0.71, 0.61, 0.52, 0.37), - PEC_total = c(0.78, 0.68, 0.55, 0.38)) + PEC_total = c(0.78, 0.68, 0.55, 0.38)) |> + mutate(across(c(runoff, erosion), ~ set_units(., "mg"))) |> + mutate(across(starts_with("PEC_"), ~ set_units(., "\u00B5g/L"))) res_1 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(100, Koc = 1000, DT50 = 1000) res_pfm_1 <- data.frame( - runoff = round(1000 * res_1$runoff["dissolved"], 2), - erosion = round(1000 * res_1$runoff["bound"], 2), + runoff = round(set_units(res_1$runoff[["dissolved"]], "mg"), 2), + erosion = round(set_units(res_1$runoff[["bound"]], "mg"), 2), PEC_dissolved = round(res_1$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"], PEC_total = round(res_1$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_1$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2)) expect_equivalent(res_exposit_1, res_pfm_1) @@ -23,12 +28,14 @@ test_that("Runoff PECsw are as in Exposit 3.02", { runoff = c(0.08, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02), erosion = c(36.63, 21.98, 5.49, 1.83), PEC_dissolved = c(0, 0, 0, 0), - PEC_total = c(0.14, 0.12, 0.04, 0.02)) + PEC_total = c(0.14, 0.12, 0.04, 0.02)) |> + mutate(across(c(runoff, erosion), ~ set_units(., "mg"))) |> + mutate(across(starts_with("PEC_"), ~ set_units(., "\u00B5g/L"))) res_2 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(10, Koc = 300000, DT50 = 10) res_pfm_2 <- data.frame( - runoff = round(1000 * res_2$runoff["dissolved"], 2), - erosion = round(1000 * res_2$runoff["bound"], 2), + runoff = round(set_units(res_2$runoff[["dissolved"]], "mg"), 2), + erosion = round(set_units(res_2$runoff[["bound"]], "mg"), 2), PEC_dissolved = round(res_2$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"], PEC_total = round(res_2$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_2$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2)) @@ -39,12 +46,14 @@ test_that("Runoff PECsw are as in Exposit 3.02", { runoff = c(295.78, 177.47, 118.31, 59.16), erosion = rep(0.00, 4), PEC_dissolved = c(1.14, 0.99, 0.85, 0.59), - PEC_total = c(1.14, 0.99, 0.85, 0.59)) + PEC_total = c(1.14, 0.99, 0.85, 0.59)) |> + mutate(across(c(runoff, erosion), ~ set_units(., "mg"))) |> + mutate(across(starts_with("PEC_"), ~ set_units(., "\u00B5g/L"))) res_3 <- PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(200, Koc = 30, DT50 = 100) res_pfm_3 <- data.frame( - runoff = round(1000 * res_3$runoff["dissolved"], 2), - erosion = round(1000 * res_3$runoff["bound"], 2), + runoff = round(set_units(res_3$runoff[["dissolved"]], "mg"), 2), + erosion = round(set_units(res_3$runoff[["bound"]], "mg"), 2), PEC_dissolved = round(res_3$PEC_sw_runoff, 2)["dissolved"], PEC_total = round(res_3$PEC_sw_runoff["dissolved"] + res_3$PEC_sw_runoff["bound"], 2)) |