diff options
| author | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
| commit | 69504b635d388507bce650c44b3bfe17cad3383e (patch) | |
| tree | 120114ff6dc2d1aeb4716efef90d71257ac47501 /man/calplot.lm.Rd | |
| parent | 6d118690c0cae02fc5cd4b28c1a67eecde4d9f60 (diff) | |
- Fixed the inverse prediction
- Now I have a working approach for the calculation of LOD and LOQ,
but it seems to be different from what everybody else is doing
(e.g. Massart chaper 13). I like it, however. Maybe it even
yields a paper.
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@8 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
Diffstat (limited to 'man/calplot.lm.Rd')
| -rw-r--r-- | man/calplot.lm.Rd | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/man/calplot.lm.Rd b/man/calplot.lm.Rd index efdea3d..6d3f52d 100644 --- a/man/calplot.lm.Rd +++ b/man/calplot.lm.Rd @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The label of the y axis. } \item{alpha}{ - The confidence level for the confidence and prediction bands. + The error tolerance level for the confidence and prediction bands. } } \value{ |