% This file was originally created with JabRef 2.7b.
% Encoding: ISO8859_1
@BOOK{bates1988,
title = {Nonlinear regression and its applications},
publisher = {Wiley-Interscience},
year = {1988},
author = {D. Bates and D. Watts}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUSkinetics2011,
title = {Generic guidance for estimating persistence and degradation kinetics
from environmental fate studies on pesticides in EU registration},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
edition = {1.0},
month = {November},
year = {2011},
file = {FOCUS kinetics 2011 Generic guidance:/home/ranke/dok/orgs/focus/FOCUSkineticsvc_1_0_Nov23.pdf:PDF},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUSkinetics2014,
title = {Generic guidance for estimating persistence and degradation kinetics
from environmental fate studies on pesticides in EU registration},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
edition = {1.1},
month = {December},
year = {2014},
file = {FOCUS kinetics 2011 Generic guidance:/home/ranke/dok/orgs/focus/dk/FOCUSkineticsvc1.1Dec2014.pdf:PDF},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUS2006,
title = {Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics
from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration.
Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
year = {2006},
note = {EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{rcore2016,
title = {\textsf{R}: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing},
author = {{R Development Core Team}},
organization = {R Foundation for Statistical Computing},
address = {Vienna, Austria},
year = {2016},
note = {{ISBN} 3-900051-07-0},
url = {https://www.R-project.org}
}
@MANUAL{pkg:mkin,
title = {`{mkin}`: {K}inetic evaluation of chemical degradation data},
author = {J. Ranke},
year = {2019},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mkin}
}
@Inproceedings{ schaefer2007,
title = {{KinGUI}: a new kinetic software tool for evaluations according to {FOCUS} degradation kinetics},
author = {D. Sch\"{a}fer and B. Mikolasch and P. Rainbird and B. Harvey},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the XIII Symposium Pesticide Chemistry},
editor = {Del Re A. A. M. and Capri E. and Fragoulis G. and Trevisan M.},
year = {2007},
address = {Piacenza},
pages = {916--923}
}
@ARTICLE{soetaert2010,
author = {Karline Soetaert and Thomas Petzoldt},
title = {Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in {R} Using
Package {FME}},
journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
year = {2010},
volume = {33},
pages = {1--28},
number = {3},
url = {https://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i03/}
}
@Inproceedings{ ranke2012,
title = {Parameter reliability in kinetic evaluation of environmental metabolism data - Assessment and the influence of model specification},
author = {J. Ranke and R. Lehmann},
booktitle = {SETAC World 20-24 May},
year = {2012},
address = {Berlin}
}
@Inproceedings{ ranke2015,
title = {To t-test or not to t-test, that is the question},
author = {J. Ranke and R. Lehmann},
booktitle = {XV Symposium on Pesticide Chemistry 2-4 September 2015},
year = {2015},
address = {Piacenza},
url = {http://chem.uft.uni-bremen.de/ranke/posters/piacenza_2015.pdf}
}
@Techreport{ranke2014,
title = {{Prüfung und Validierung von Modellierungssoftware als Alternative zu
ModelMaker 4.0}},
author = {J. Ranke},
year = 2014,
institution = {Umweltbundesamt},
volume = {Projektnummer 27452}
}
@Article{ranke2018,
author="Ranke, Johannes
and W{\"o}ltjen, Janina
and Meinecke, Stefan",
title="Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data",
journal="Environmental Sciences Europe",
year="2018",
month="May",
day="18",
volume="30",
number="1",
pages="17",
abstract="For evaluating the fate of xenobiotics in the environment, a variety of degradation or environmental metabolism experiments are routinely conducted. The data generated in such experiments are evaluated by optimizing the parameters of kinetic models in a way that the model simulation fits the data. No comparison of the main software tools currently in use has been published to date. This article shows a comparison of numerical results as well as an overall, somewhat subjective comparison based on a scoring system using a set of criteria. The scoring was separately performed for two types of uses. Uses of type I are routine evaluations involving standard kinetic models and up to three metabolites in a single compartment. Evaluations involving non-standard model components, more than three metabolites or more than a single compartment belong to use type II. For use type I, usability is most important, while the flexibility of the model definition is most important for use type II.",
issn="2190-4715",
doi="10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1",
url="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1"
}
@Article{gao11,
Title = {Improving uncertainty analysis in kinetic evaluations using iteratively reweighted least squares},
Author = {Gao, Z. and Green, J.W. and Vanderborght, J. and Schmitt, W.},
Journal = {Environmental Science and Technology},
Year = {2011},
Pages = {4429-4437},
Volume = {45},
Type = {Journal}
}
