1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
% This file was originally created with JabRef 2.7b.
% Encoding: ISO8859_1
@BOOK{bates1988,
title = {Nonlinear regression and its applications},
publisher = {Wiley-Interscience},
year = {1988},
author = {D. Bates and D. Watts}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUSkinetics2011,
title = {Generic guidance for estimating persistence and degradation kinetics
from environmental fate studies on pesticides in EU registration},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
edition = {1.0},
month = {November},
year = {2011},
file = {FOCUS kinetics 2011 Generic guidance:/home/ranke/dok/orgs/focus/FOCUSkineticsvc_1_0_Nov23.pdf:PDF},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUSkinetics2014,
title = {Generic guidance for estimating persistence and degradation kinetics
from environmental fate studies on pesticides in EU registration},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
edition = {1.1},
month = {December},
year = {2014},
file = {FOCUS kinetics 2011 Generic guidance:/home/ranke/dok/orgs/focus/dk/FOCUSkineticsvc1.1Dec2014.pdf:PDF},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{FOCUS2006,
title = {Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics
from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration.
Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics},
author = {{FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics}},
year = {2006},
note = {EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0},
url = {http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics}
}
@MANUAL{rcore2016,
title = {\textsf{R}: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing},
author = {{R Development Core Team}},
organization = {R Foundation for Statistical Computing},
address = {Vienna, Austria},
year = {2016},
note = {{ISBN} 3-900051-07-0},
url = {https://www.R-project.org}
}
@MANUAL{pkg:mkin,
title = {`{mkin}`: {K}inetic evaluation of chemical degradation data},
author = {J. Ranke},
year = {2019},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mkin}
}
@Inproceedings{ schaefer2007,
title = {{KinGUI}: a new kinetic software tool for evaluations according to {FOCUS} degradation kinetics},
author = {D. Sch\"{a}fer and B. Mikolasch and P. Rainbird and B. Harvey},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the XIII Symposium Pesticide Chemistry},
editor = {Del Re A. A. M. and Capri E. and Fragoulis G. and Trevisan M.},
year = {2007},
address = {Piacenza},
pages = {916--923}
}
@ARTICLE{soetaert2010,
author = {Karline Soetaert and Thomas Petzoldt},
title = {Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in {R} Using
Package {FME}},
journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
year = {2010},
volume = {33},
pages = {1--28},
number = {3},
url = {https://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i03/}
}
@Inproceedings{ ranke2012,
title = {Parameter reliability in kinetic evaluation of environmental metabolism data - Assessment and the influence of model specification},
author = {J. Ranke and R. Lehmann},
booktitle = {SETAC World 20-24 May},
year = {2012},
address = {Berlin}
}
@Inproceedings{ ranke2015,
title = {To t-test or not to t-test, that is the question},
author = {J. Ranke and R. Lehmann},
booktitle = {XV Symposium on Pesticide Chemistry 2-4 September 2015},
year = {2015},
address = {Piacenza},
url = {http://chem.uft.uni-bremen.de/ranke/posters/piacenza_2015.pdf}
}
@Techreport{ranke2014,
title = {{Prüfung und Validierung von Modellierungssoftware als Alternative zu
ModelMaker 4.0}},
author = {J. Ranke},
year = 2014,
institution = {Umweltbundesamt},
volume = {Projektnummer 27452}
}
@Article{ranke2018,
author="Ranke, Johannes
and W{\"o}ltjen, Janina
and Meinecke, Stefan",
title="Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data",
journal="Environmental Sciences Europe",
year="2018",
month="May",
day="18",
volume="30",
number="1",
pages="17",
abstract="For evaluating the fate of xenobiotics in the environment, a variety of degradation or environmental metabolism experiments are routinely conducted. The data generated in such experiments are evaluated by optimizing the parameters of kinetic models in a way that the model simulation fits the data. No comparison of the main software tools currently in use has been published to date. This article shows a comparison of numerical results as well as an overall, somewhat subjective comparison based on a scoring system using a set of criteria. The scoring was separately performed for two types of uses. Uses of type I are routine evaluations involving standard kinetic models and up to three metabolites in a single compartment. Evaluations involving non-standard model components, more than three metabolites or more than a single compartment belong to use type II. For use type I, usability is most important, while the flexibility of the model definition is most important for use type II.",
issn="2190-4715",
doi="10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1",
url="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1"
}
@Article{gao11,
Title = {Improving uncertainty analysis in kinetic evaluations using iteratively reweighted least squares},
Author = {Gao, Z. and Green, J.W. and Vanderborght, J. and Schmitt, W.},
Journal = {Environmental Science and Technology},
Year = {2011},
Pages = {4429-4437},
Volume = {45},
Type = {Journal}
}
|
