diff options
| author | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2023-11-12 21:59:34 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2023-11-12 21:59:34 +0100 |
| commit | 4079a2c496aa4e8c6dc2a93afedcbedbf7a852b5 (patch) | |
| tree | 8281ddd094c84d3bd0663fe2f060985f4a212e6b /docs/reference/GUS.html | |
| parent | d66bd4aa0bf9c4d9b8793a4e308c9e80691b440f (diff) | |
Enable markdown and rebuild docs
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/reference/GUS.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/reference/GUS.html | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/docs/reference/GUS.html b/docs/reference/GUS.html index d2aa03b..e3a451e 100644 --- a/docs/reference/GUS.html +++ b/docs/reference/GUS.html @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ be conducted under use conditions.</p></dd> <dt>Koc</dt> <dd><p>The sorption constant normalised to organic carbon. Gustafson does not mention the nonlinearity of the sorption constant commonly -found and usually described by Freundlich sorption, therefore it is +found and usually described by Freundlich sorption, therefore it is unclear at which reference concentration the Koc should be observed (and if the reference concentration would be in soil or in porewater).</p></dd> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ chyaml field, this information is used, with defaults specified below.</p></dd> <dt>degradation_value</dt> -<dd><p>Which of the available degradation values should +<dd><p>Which of the available degradation values should be used?</p></dd> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ be Koc values at a concentration of 1 mg/L in the water phase.</p></dd> <p>A list with the DT50 and Koc used as well as the resulting score - of class GUS_result</p> +of class GUS_result</p> </div> <div class="section level2"> <h2 id="references">References<a class="anchor" aria-label="anchor" href="#references"></a></h2> |