aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2017-05-16 18:40:25 +0200
committerJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2017-05-16 18:40:25 +0200
commit3e26a8ab76a434c3465ea1db1b4a2a2ff3ea8ec8 (patch)
treec1830d0d479574f037f86b127cee809c350d163a /man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
parent36036b5901223591e7e21e8b73d8cd1fb034f4cb (diff)
Add TWA concentrations for days > 1, fix link
Now we have seven test calculations for the Step 1 calculator, all perfectly passing. This provides confidence that this is a correct reimplementation of the Step 1 part of the Step 1/2 calculator.
Diffstat (limited to 'man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd')
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd15
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
index 22c20c5..656bd6d 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ PEC_sw_focus(parent, rate, n = 1, i = NA, met = NULL, f_drift = NA,
f_rd = 0.1, scenario = FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios$names)
}
\arguments{
-\item{parent}{A list containing substance specific parameters}
+\item{parent}{A list containing substance specific parameters, e.g.
+conveniently generated by \code{\link{chent_focus_sw}}.}
\item{rate}{The application rate in g/ha. Overriden when
applications are given explicitly}
@@ -17,12 +18,13 @@ applications are given explicitly}
\item{i}{The application interval}
-\item{met}{A list containing metabolite specific parameters. If not NULL,
+\item{met}{A list containing metabolite specific parameters. e.g.
+conveniently generated by \code{\link{chent_focus_sw}}. If not NULL,
the PEC is calculated for this compound, not the parent.}
\item{f_drift}{The fraction of the application rate reaching the waterbody
via drift. If NA, this is derived from the scenario name and the number
-of applications via the drift data defined by the
+of applications via the drift data defined by the
\code{\link{FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios}}}
\item{f_rd}{The fraction of the amount applied reaching the waterbody via
@@ -42,9 +44,12 @@ this implementation.
\note{
The formulas for input to the waterbody via runoff/drainage of the
parent and subsequent formation of the metabolite in water is not
- documented in the model description coming with the calculator
+ documented in the model description coming with the calculator. As one would
+ expecte, this additional input appears to be (as we get the same results)
+ calculated by multiplying the application rate with the molar weight
+ correction and the formation fraction in water/sediment systems.
-Step 2 is not implemented
+Step 2 is not implemented.
}
\examples{
# Parent only

Contact - Imprint