Enable markdown and rebuild docs

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html b/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html
index abe8e5a..98ac3ac 100644
--- a/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html
+++ b/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html
@@ -225,33 +225,33 @@ from the EFSA guidance from 2015 (p. 80) are be reproduced, this is not
 true for the TWA concentrations given for the same example in the EFSA guidance
 from 2017 (p. 92).</p>
 <p>According to the EFSA guidance (EFSA, 2017, p. 43), leaching should be
-  taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth
-  (here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes
-  place.  However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth
-  (often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function
-  is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate.</p>
+taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth
+(here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes
+place.  However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth
+(often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function
+is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate.</p>
 <p>If temperature information is available in the selected scenarios, as
-  e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling
-  (destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50
-  with destination 'PECsoil'.</p>
+e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling
+(destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50
+with destination 'PECsoil'.</p>
     </div>
     <div class="section level2">
     <h2 id="references">References<a class="anchor" aria-label="anchor" href="#references"></a></h2>
     <p>EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012)
-  Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario
-  selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental
-  concentrations of plant protection products in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em>
-  <b>10</b>(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562</p>
+Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario
+selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental
+concentrations of plant protection products in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em>
+<b>10</b>(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562</p>
 <p>EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2017) EFSA guidance document for
-  predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant
-  protection products and transformation products of these active substances
-  in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em> <b>15</b>(10) 4982
-  doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982</p>
+predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant
+protection products and transformation products of these active substances
+in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em> <b>15</b>(10) 4982
+doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982</p>
 <p>EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) EFSA guidance document for
-  predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant
-  protection products and transformation products of these active substances
-  in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em> <b>13</b>(4) 4093
-  doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093</p>
+predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant
+protection products and transformation products of these active substances
+in soil. <em>EFSA Journal</em> <b>13</b>(4) 4093
+doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093</p>
     </div>
     <div class="section level2">
     <h2 id="author">Author<a class="anchor" aria-label="anchor" href="#author"></a></h2>